Professional consensus
Veterinary, behaviour and dog-training bodies, plus kennel and dog-welfare organisations, that have published statements, codes or policies opposing aversive tools or requiring reward-based practice.
Showing 141–160 of 166. This is a working record of publicly aligned positions.
Kennel bodies and dog welfare charities
Indian umbrella body supporting humane companion-animal standards.
Read moreKennel bodies and dog welfare charities
Works for companion-animal welfare standards that reject unnecessary pain.
Read moreKennel bodies and dog welfare charities
Works for compassionate treatment of companion and rescued animals across Asia.
Read moreKennel bodies and dog welfare charities
Promotes humane companion-animal care and responsible, reward-based training.
Read moreVeterinary and behaviour science
“Aversive techniques that inflict pain or induce fear should not be used. These include physical or psychological punishment and the use of choke, prong and electric shock collars.”
Advocates force-free training. Aversive techniques that inflict pain or induce fear should not be used, including choke, prong and electric shock collars.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
ABTC assessing organisation teaching and accrediting trainers to science-led, ethical standards recognised by UK welfare charities.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Global network of assessed behaviourists using science-based, force-free methods. Welfare is not to be compromised.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“No member will use or endorse check, prong, electric, or anti-bark collars. Training methods will be welfare based, ethical, science-based and positive reinforcement driven.”
Members must not use force, fear or punitive methods, or endorse check, prong, electric or anti-bark collars.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
“That means no choke chains, prong collars, electric shock devices, or punitive techniques, ever.”
Promotes force-free, reward-based training. No choke chains, prong collars, electric shock devices or punitive techniques.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
ABTC practitioner and assessing organisation whose members use science-led, compassionate and ethical methods.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
International initiative whose position paper and code of conduct reject aversive tools and gather supporting organisations.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Network of member organisations committed to a force-free training and animal-welfare ethos.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Alliance of trainers working from force-free, relationship-based practice rather than pain-based tools.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Pet-career academy teaching reward-based dog training rather than aversive equipment.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Education body teaching force-free, science-based dog training.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Force-free education programme teaching life skills without shock, prong or choke equipment.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Sarah Fisher education programme built on observation, choice and gentle handling rather than aversive tools.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Education platform teaching science-based, force-free canine practice.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Education community teaching force-free, evidence-based animal training.
Read moreTraining and behaviour organisations
Force-free education and behaviour support that does not use shock or prong equipment.
Read moreThis page is a reference list of publicly available position statements, codes and policies. Inclusion here means the published wording aligns with ICLAC’s aims. It does not mean that the organisation has formally endorsed ICLAC or joined ICLAC.